Gender Rating Disparities in Online Reviews

8 October, 2024

gender gaps in online reviews

 

A study led by researchers from the Erasmus School of Economics, The Hebrew University, and Ben-Gurion University of the Negev reveals a significant gender rating gap in online reviews, with possible economic and social implications. Analysis of over 1.2 billion reviews on platforms such as Amazon, Google, and Yelp indicates that women consistently provide higher ratings than men. This gap appears to stem from women's greater reluctance to share negative feedback, likely driven by societal pressures to avoid backlash. The researchers emphasize the need for awareness of this pervasive issue and advocate for efforts to create an environment where indvididuals, especially women, feel comfortable expressing their opinions without fear of consequence. 

 

Research Highlights

A collaborative effort by Dr. Andreas Bayerl from the Erasmus School of Economics, Dr. Yaniv Dover from the Hebrew University, and Prof. Hila Riemer and Prof. Danny Shapira from the Ben-Gurion University has identified this significant gender rating gap across major platforms, including Amazon, Google, IMDb, TripAdvisor, and Yelp. By analyzing over 1.2 billion actual online reviews and conducting two controlled lab experiments, the study reveals that gender differences in the willingness to express negative feedback contribute to this disparity.

 

The findings reveal that while men and women generally have similar attitudes towards products and experiences, women are less likely to voice their dissatisfaction in public forums. This reluctance may stem from societal expectations that encourage communal and empathetic behavior among women, leading to fears of backflash or negative evaluations. 

 

"Our findings point to a broader societal issue," the researchers state. "Women are less likely to express dissatisfaction in online reviews, not because they are more satisfied, but because they are more concerned about potential social consequences when sharing negative opinions."

 

"Women are less likely to express dissatisfaction in online reviews, not because they are more satisfied, but because they are more concerned about potential social consequences when sharing negative opinions."

 

Key Findings 

  • Women's average ratings are approximately 0.1 stars higher than men's on a 5-point scale. This gap is significant, as small differences in online review scores can lead to considerable changes in rankings, with important economic implications.
  • Lab experiments reveal that when dissatisfied, women are less likely than men to post reviews, while satisfied individuals of both genders submit reviews at similar rates.
  • The gender rating gap is consistent across various contexts, platforms, and geographic regions, indicating it is a widespread issue in online review culture.

 

The researchers also discuss potential solutions to mitigate bias in online review ratings, urging platforms to foster more inclusive environments where women feel comfortable sharing their honest opinions. They suggest considering anonymous reviews, while also noting that anonymity can sometimes lead to toxic environments; thus platform managers must find a balance between transparency and inclusiveness. 

 

Implications for Society

These findings have significant implications for consumers, businesses, online platforms, and society at large. Given the crucial role of online reviews in influencing purchasing decisions, the gender rating gap may distort perceptions of products and services. Minor rating differences can lead to substantial shifts in rankings, potentially disadvantaging businesses or misguiding consumer choices.

 

"To ensure fair representation of opinions, we need to address the factors that prevent individuals, particularly women, from sharing their true experiences, especially when they are dissatisfied."

 

"This research serves as a call to action for platforms, businesses, and society as a whole," the researchers emphasize. "To ensure fair representation of opinions, we need to address the factors that prevent individuals, particularly women, from sharing their true experiences, especially when they are dissatisfied."

 

The research paper titled “Gender rating gap in online reviews” is now available in Nature Human Behaviour and can be accessed here

 

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-024-02003-6

 

Researchers:

  • Andreas Bayerl1* 
  • Yaniv Dover2,3
  • Hila Riemer4
  • Daniel Shapira5,6

 

Institutions:

  1. Erasmus School of Economics, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam 3062 PA, The Netherlands
  2. Jerusalem School of Business Administration, Hebrew University, Jerusalem 91905, Israel
  3. Federmann Center for the Study of Rationality, Edmond J. Safra Campus, Hebrew University, Jerusalem 91904, Israel
  4. Department of Management, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva 84105, Israel
  5. Department of Business and Administration, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva 84105, Israel
  6. Adjunct Research Faculty at the University of Mannheim Business School, 68131 Mannheim, Germany

 

In these challenging times, Hebrew University of Jerusalem remains dedicated to our mission of building a better future through education and research. We extend our sincere gratitude to friends and partners worldwide who have shown unwavering solidarity during these difficult times. Together, we will overcome the challenges we face, and our joint pursuit of knowledge remains steadfast.